While every medical professional takes an oath to “do no harm”, sometimes they act in a negligent manner leading to harm or injury.
When a person is a victim of medical negligence or malpractice, they have the right to be compensated for their losses.
Under New York law, medical negligence only occurs when the professional acts contrary to the standard of care, and ends up causing direct harm or injury to the client. This act of failure to act must be below the standard of practice and the harm should have been foreseeable by a medical professional.
When medical negligence occurs, the right way to behave is to prove the negligence and legal redress. If you can prove that indeed the medical professional was negligent, then you may have a solid case. Here are some wise ways to prove medical negligence.
Do Patients Still Have the Ability to Sue?
Although some states have laws that have restrictions on the rights to sue for negligence, the ability has not been eliminated. If you can prove the medical professional acted contrary to the standard of care, then you probably have a tight case. However, the devil is always in the details.
This is perhaps the most important element yet the most difficult of a medical negligence case. Even some lawyers often have it hard getting around it. You may have the proof that what the medical professional did was wrong, but proving the harm was as a result of the wrong thing is a shaky affair. Sometimes, even deciding whether the case involves legal and factual issues is a challenge. You need a good lawyer on your side to look this up for you.
The biggest challenge for most patients who file lawsuits is the existing law that mounts a defense for all professionals accused of negligence. The law says that if the professional acted in a way that all professional’s peers widely agree as to the standard of practice, then the professional is not liable. Notably, “widely accepted” does not undoubtedly mean that it is the majority’s practice. The great news is, the law does not prevent a patient from suing for an injury caused by a medical professional. In fact, it is up to the professional to answer the claims. The difference is the professional had to prove that indeed their conduct was “widely accepted” by peers. As a natural consequence, the question remains on how far the courts will allow the defense to stretch.
Failure to Warn
Did the professional warn you of a possible negative outcome of the procedure? It is very common for patients to call law firms saying, “I’d have never agreed to the procedure had Dr. Matt told me it’d end up like this”. Injuries resulting from these procedures may prove a case if it is proved the medical professional divides sufficiently want them of potential risks.
Also known as “failure to warn”, these cases are a challenge for both the injured person and their lawyer. An industry expert at a leading New York personal injury law firm advises that to succeed in such cases, you need to prove certain aspects:
- That the outcome from the procedure was a known risk
- That it was not an insignificant risk
- That the professional failed to make you aware of the risk
- That had you known the risk you wouldn’t have consented to the procedure
Failure to warn claims gives many a second base. Fewer people can prove that the professional didn’t warn them of the risk, but this is one area where the law allows the patient’s word over the doctor’s insistence. A copy of the doctor’s notes is widely consulted on this. However, many claims fail on the fourth aspect as the judges have a hard time believing one would not accept a recommendation from a doctor for a problem that got them there. People take risks involving taking pain killers, crossing the street, or agreeing to a medical procedure. A good personal injury lawyer will have all these details looked up before you decide to file a claim so that you know how strong your case is.
Unfortunately, as medical professionals go about their jobs, the patient’s capacity to sue has reduced but cases of negligence haven’t. Medical negligence law is technical and full of pitfalls for many. It is extremely important to consult a lawyer that is well familiar with the changing laws and the evolving interpretation of these laws by the courts.
These amazing insights have helped many build a strong case to seek compensation for injuries caused. Always, consult an expert.
Harlem Cultural Archives is a donor and foundation-supported Historical Society, Its mission is to create, maintain and grow a remotely accessible, online, interactive repository of audio-visual materials documenting Harlem’s remarkable and varied multicultural legacies, including its storied past as well as its continuing contributions to the City and State of New York, the nation, and the world. Support Harlem Cultural Archives and click here to get more Harlem History, Thank you.